NEET-UG 2024: Deep rot symptom
– Sudheendra Kulkarni is a former aide of prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee (1999-2004) and currently founder, Forum for South Asia. Prime minister Modi is likely to meet China’s President Xi Jingping at the BRICS Summit in Russia on October 22-24. They should sieze the moment to restore ancient harmonious relations The Economist, the world’s leading weekly magazine, cannot be accused of a pro-China bias. The opposite is true. It regularly features news and commentary critical of the country. Therefore, its readers were taken aback by a cover feature recently titled ‘China has become a Scientific Superpower’ (June 12). It reports that from plant biology to superconductor physics, from renewable energy to digital technologies, latter day China is at the cutting edge. In 2003, America produced 20 multiples of high-impact scientific papers than China. Now China has surpassed America and the entire European Union on this metric. Establishing world-class universities and government institutions, and encouraging best Chinese brains abroad to return to China, has been a part of Beijing’s scientific development plan. Between 2000-2019, more than six million Chinese students left the country to study abroad. Now, more scientists have been returning to the country than leaving. China now hosts more research scholars than America and the European Union combined. “Tsinghua is now the #1 science and technology university of the world,” says Simon Marginson, a professor of higher education at Oxford University. “That’s amazing. They’ve done that in a generation.” How is all this transforming China’s economy and, more important, how could it impact India? To examine the first question, it is useful to understand what the Communist Party of China (CPC) is doing to overcome the current slowdown in the economy and also to achieve “common prosperity” in society by significantly reducing social and regional disparities. At its landmark ‘third plenum’ held in July, CPC stressed that its goal is ‘high quality development’ (and not mere quantitative GDP growth). To achieve this goal, China is relying on the rise of “new quality productive forces” driven by latest advances in science and technology. Under this objective, it intends to modernise every sector of the Chinese economy — agriculture, industry, financial system, infrastructure, logistics, services, healthcare and the rest — with the use of AI, robotics, blockchain, life sciences and other science and technology breakthroughs to usher in an era of unprecedented gains in productivity and efficiency. China now ranks #1 worldwide in the number of science and technology innovation clusters. Moreover, in terms of production and use of solar photovoltaic panels and other clean and green energy products, China is far ahead of the rest of the world. In fact, China installed more solar panels in 2023 than the US has ever built, setting new standards in low carbon footprint. Even more creditable is that China has achieved all this with atmanirbharata (self-reliance), in which it is far ahead of India. Without maximum self-reliance in scientific research and technological innovation in strategic areas, it could not have withstood the…
Clearing Waqf corruption & confusion
– Mohammad Sajjad is Professor, modern and contemporary Indian history, Aligarh Muslim University Against the backdrop of the Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency, and Development Bill 2024 having been referred to a JPC, the author proposes ways and means to fortify it With tabling of the United Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency, and Development (UMEED) Bill 2024, in Parliament — since referred to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) for further examination — India’s 32 Waqf Boards have come under public scrutiny. They reportedly control 8.7 lakh properties spanning 9.4 lakh acres countrywide. Linguistically, the word Waqf (tied-up or locked up), also known as habs (locking, selling and purchase of assets earmarked as charitable endowments), or mortmain property, is an inalienable charitable endowment under Islamic law. Typically, it involves donating real estate — land and buildings — for Muslim religious or charitable purposes with no intention of reclaiming the donated assets. It’s important to note that a large proportion of Waqf property comprises graveyards (Qabristan) which don’t yield any income. Some paltry (mostly oral and unregistered) Waqf assets are owned by village/mohalla mosques (which are maintained through meagre or no incomes). These “assets” add to the corpus of Waqfs, but don’t yield any income. This is a point the Sachar Report (2006), which highlighted the poverty of India’s Muslim minority, failed to note. However it revealed that, “There are more than 4.9 lakh registered Waqfs (with estates and assets) spread across the country but the current annual income from these properties is only about Rs.163 crore, which amounts to a meagre 2.7 percent rate of return…. The current… market value (income generated) from Waqf properties can be put at Rs.1.2 lakh crore.” Misgivings about the Waqf Bill 2024. The proposed Bill challenges exclusive Muslim composition of the Waqf Boards as mandated by the Waqf Act 1995. It proposes to abolish the power of (provincial/state government) Waqf Boards to issue notices or hold enquiry into the ownership of property that it believes belongs to a Waqf. Another misgiving is that the mutawallis (managers/administrators) are obliged to transfer their power to District Collectors. Moreover, the proposed Bill doesn’t address the concerns recorded in the Sachar Report; nor does this Bill propose mandatory digital transparency by displaying all estates and assets of Waqfs on their websites. Another anomaly is that it doesn’t insist upon annual auditing of the income-expenditure of Waqf Boards. Similar legislation for governance of Hindu mutths (with large estates) and mahanths (who practically own and manage the mutths) has not been enacted. The Waqf Bill 2024, therefore, is discriminatory against Muslim institutions. Overall, mistrust between the Indian state and its Muslim community persists almost perpetually. India’s Muslims have all along been doggedly resisting state interference in reforming Muslim personal laws, and reforming the governance structure of the Aligarh Muslim University which is heavily dominated by certain cliques. Simultaneously, sections of India’s Muslim elites have also been misleading the by preventing initiatives to make necessary reforms from within. Therefore, some reforms need to be…