Jobs in Education System

Panel Discussion: ‘Dangers of age-inappropriate ECE’

EducationWorld February 13 | Cover Story EducationWorld

At the EducationWorld ECE Global Conference 2013, a panel discussion convened to discuss the dangers of age-inappropriate ECE, drew a packed house. The panel chaired by Summiya Yasmeen (SY), managing editor of EducationWorld, included Dr. K.R. Maalathi (KRM), a Chennai-based education consultant and advisor to the Ashok Piramal Group, Mumbai, and Children Welfare Society, Dubai; Dr. Shekhar Seshadri (SS), professor, department of child and adolescent psychiatry, NIMHANS (National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences), Bangalore; Lina Ashar (LA), founder-promoter of 56 Kangaroo Kids preschools and 18 Billabong High International schools in 20 cities in India; and Priya Krishnan (PK), founder-CEO of the Bangalore-based VBHC Education Services. Excerpts of the 90-minute panel discussion. SY: There are an estimated 220,000 private preschools countrywide. But they lack standardised syllabuses and curriculums. Lina, do you agree that most of them are developmentally inappropriate? LA: I don’t want to comment on the curriculums of other schools. In Kangaroo Kids preschools, we pay great attention to delivering age-appropriate ECE. But more than age-appropriate curriculums, there is a great need to upgrade the country’s teacher training institutions and extend their coverage to include ECE. All over the developed world, four years of higher education is mandatory for preschool teachers. Here teacher training colleges offer a one-year programme with some certifying them after three months, which is clearly inadequate. SY: Maalathi, preschool teachers say parental pressure is forcing them to teach literacy and numeracy to very young children. What’s your comment? KRM: Professional ECE educators won’t dream of imposing age-inappropriate literacy and numeracy education in preschools. But parental pressure often determines their curriculums. Ignorant parents anxious to give their children an early start, influence private preschool promoters to impose age-inappropriate early learning curriculums which damage, rather than develop little children. And this is happening because of increasing privatisation and commercialisation of ECE. SY: Dr. Seshadri, what do you think is the psychological and emotional fallout of forcing age-inappropriate learning in early childhood? SS: Our research on development methodologies suggests that too much is being taught too soon in preschools in India. Parents and ECE teachers must understand that information is not knowledge. There’s no point in loading little children with information as it will fast disappear from their reverberatory circuits and conversion won’t happen. Both these communities must understand — or be made to understand — that the basic objective of ECE is to teach little children to learn how to learn. Teaching too much too soon makes children believe there is a certain expectation of outcomes. Great expectations and over emphasis on right answers feed fear and anxiety. SY: Most preschool promoters say the reason why they begin to teach too much too early is because parents are anxious about preschools preparing children for admission into top primary schools. And whether we like it or not, most primary schools have admission tests and interviews. Priya, what’s your comment? PK: Yes there is constant pressure from parents who have a wish list of primary-secondary schools into which they want their children admitted. Therefore we assume the burden of educating parents about RTE Act guidelines to enable

Already a subscriber
Click here to log in and continue reading by entering your registered email address or subscribe now
Join with us in our mission to build the pressure of public opinion to make education the #1 item on the national agenda
Current Issue
EducationWorld November 2024
ParentsWorld October 2024

Access USA
Xperimentor
WordPress Lightbox Plugin