Gayathri Muthukumar
Gayathri Muthukumar (17), a class XII student of the National Public School, Indiranagar, Bangalore, is the newly crowned Season Seven champion of the Indian National Brain Bee 2014 — an all-India competition open to class XI students. Launched by the Mumbai-based Seven Hills Hospitals, the objective of this annual competition is to inspire youth to seek careers in basic and clinical neurosciences. Before she became national champion on April 20, Gayathri bested 3,600 entrants from 180 schools in the 240-minute final staged in Mumbai. As this year’s winner she bagged a trophy, laptop, certificate and an all-expenses paid trip to Washington DC, to participate in the 16th International Brain Bee finals scheduled for August 7-10. “My parents and elder sister, an IIT-Madras graduate, mentored me through the entire process, as all of them are keenly interested in science. I’m also grateful to my teachers for encouraging me to participate and helping me prepare for this unique event,” says this younger of two daughters of Kalyan, principal engineer, Intel India, and Vijaya, a homemaker. Eminent neurologists including Dr. Susheel Wadhwa of the Narayana Hrudayalaya (Bangalore), Dr. Subhash Kaul, head of department (neurology) at the Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences (Hyderabad), and Brig. S.P. Gorthi, professor and head of department (neurology), Army Hospital (New Delhi), adjudged the competition which comprised a quiz, a written brain anatomy test and doctor-patient simulation rounds. The National Brain Bee has been “excellently designed” to provide exposure to youth interested in the medical sciences. “The biology education we receive in high school is very elementary. The competition goes well beyond school curriculums and stimulates students to explore nuances of the neurosciences,” says Gayathri who’s also a trained classical dancer. Although a career in biological research/medicine after class XII is a natural progression, Gayatri wants to keep her options open. “Right now I am preparing real hard to make an impact at the International Brain Bee finals in Washington,” she says. Bon Voyage! Paromita Sengupta (Bangalore)
Delhi University’s FYUP imbroglio
– Rahul Singh is the former editor of Reader’s Digest and Indian Express NOBODY COMES OUT smelling roses in Delhi University’s four year undergraduate programme (FYUP) imbroglio, following which the programme — hastily introduced last year (2013) — has been reversed in the new academic year. Neither the previous Congress-led UPA-II government, nor its successor the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA), nor the bruised DU vice-chancellor Dinesh Singh, who should have resigned but hasn’t, and least of all the University Grants Commission (UGC). All of them have lowered the prestige of what is arguably the best university in the country, even though it’s ranked a modest 441-500 in the annual World University Rankings of the London-based Quacquarelli Symonds. Together, these dramatis personae have inflicted grave damage upon DU’s 430,000 students (of whom 140,000 are full-time) and 9,000 faculty. The latter have been sacrificed on the altar of politics — the bane of Indian education, particularly higher education. Despite fancy talk about “autonomy” and “independent decision-making”, it’s now clear that the government in power calls all the shots in Indian education. A good case can be made for the FYUP which Dinesh Singh introduced towards the end of the UPA-II government’s tenure. The FYUP initiative could have aligned undergraduate education in India with international norms and prompted a revolutionary change in higher education. The laudable intent of switching from the three-year undergraduate programme to four years was to deepen the college experience and make graduates more employable. With students in India entering college at a much younger age than before, FYUP would have produced more mature and employment-ready graduates. I went up to Britain’s Cambridge University when I was 19 years old for a three-year undergraduate programme. Attending lectures was optional and students spent considerable time in the debating, film and photographic societies, to prepare for postgraduate vocations. The university authorities took it for granted that students were sufficiently mature to choose their own lifestyles. Their job was only to show the way. Therefore when we graduated we were mature and ready for working life. An estimated 12 million usually too-young Indians enter the job market every year, some highly educated, but most with dubious qualifications. As EducationWorld has highlighted (EW July), a Nasscom-McKinsey World Institute Study (2005) showed that 75 percent of engineering and 85 percent of arts, science and commerce graduates, are not fit for employment in multinational companies. The unemployability of graduates and youth in general is one of the major challenges confronting the nation. Frustrated young educated men and women without work, and little or no prospect of it, constitute a combustible mix attracted to crime and extremist ideologies of various hues. Work, especially if it’s fulfilling and adequately remunerative, is the best antidote to civil unrest and violence. Delhi University’s FYUP had another purpose, which was perhaps its hidden agenda. It was to make the varsity financially less dependent on government. Indian universities are heavily subsidised by government and the fees students pay are ridiculously low,…