California and Texas are both large states that are home to a growing population of minorities. They also share another trait. In a blow to the policy of affirmative action, public universities in the two states were forbidden, a decade ago, from using race as a factor in college admission decisions by a federal court, in Texass case, and by state law in Californias.Currently Texas guarantees admission at the state university of his or her choice to any student graduating in the top 10 percent of high school class. This helps students from predominantly minority high schools who excel relative to their peers. The University of California (UC), on the other hand, altered its admission standards in 2002 to require a comprehensive review of applications. Under that system, students win points not just for academic criteria such as grades and test scores, but also for overcoming ‘life challenges. Affirmative action by the back door, some critics say.
Both policies have had modest success in maintaining campus diversity. But now policy makers in both states are about to shake the kaleidoscope again. William Powers, the president of the Univerity of Texas (UT) at Austin, has sounded an alarm. The number of students in the top tenth of fast-growing Texas high school classes will have climbed from some 20,000 in 1998 to over 30,000 by 2015. Last year more than 80 percent of Texas freshmen at UT Austin came from this group. By 2013 it will be 100 percent.
Powers has urged lawmakers to amend the law by capping the number of students who can be admitted under the rule at half of a state universitys class. As for the other half, he wants the university to retain discretion over which students to admit, including the discretion to consider race. Without this change, Powers says, the proportion of minorities at his university will decline: the top 10 percent plan yields only about 25 percent black and Hispanic students, but the university could admit far more if it retained control over the other half of its class. The Texas legislature almost passed such a change last year; a version of it is likely to pass this year.
Meanwhile, university officials in California voted in early February to overhaul their current admissions system, which guarantees a student a place at a UC campus if he ranks in the top 4 percent of his high school class or in the top 12.5 percent of the graduating class statewide. The new plan alters the ratios so that the top 9 percent of students from each high school would be guaranteed a spot, as well as students who rank in the top 9 percent of the state as a whole. The overall effect is to make Californias system resemble the system Texas now wants to give up.
This part of the California proposal has been met with little resistance. But a second aspect troubles critics of affirmative action. The plan would create a new category of applicants: those entitled to a ‘review of their applications, though not to guaranteed admission. Under the new plan, students from roughly the top 20 percent of the states graduating class would be required to receive a comprehensive review from the campus to which they chose to apply. University officials estimate that this entitled-to-review pool will contain more whites, blacks and Hispanic students, but significantly fewer Asians, than the pool of students currently eligible for admission. Critics have accused admissions officers of using the review process as a means to reinstate racial preferences in violation of the law.
(Excerpted and adapted from The Economist)
